Europe
|
Resources |
Links open in new window. Credit Card Search - Search and compare credit card offers CreditLoan: Finance Advice, Car Loans & Bad Credit Debt Loans Computer Memory For ALL Laptops, PCs, and Printers Tours to New York City: Transfers, Hotels, Cruises, Shows Laptop Batteries Camcorder Batteries Best Gift Clubs - Wine, Hot Sauce, Cigar of the Month Clubs! Travel to Russia: hotels, visas, tours Waterproof Outdoor Electronics Enclosure - NEMA/IP Rated Badcreditloancenter.com:Finance Advice & Cash Loan Services |
Writing in the centrist Sabah (Aug. 23), Zulfu Livaneli decried the fact that this issue took priority even over crucial economic issues and much-needed preparations for the future earthquakes expected to hit Istanbul. “While politicians may not have had enough of such crises, believe me, the people are tired of them,” Livaneli stated.
Commentators in the liberal Radikal labeled the tension an “artificial crisis”, while the conservative Sabah (Aug. 23) spoke of the ringing of a “false alarm.” A columnist from the pro-Islamic Zaman (Aug. 24), Ahmet Selim, criticized the president for unilaterally deciding on the unconstitutionality of the decree. Though Selim himself believes the decree is unconstitutional, he wrote that Sezer should have pursued the matter in the constitutional court rather than simply refusing to sign and return the decree.
Most liberal observers agreed that the parliamentary process—and not the political one—is the best forum in which to consider the proposal. They differed as to what the future holds for relations between the new president and the government, mindful that the prime minister had fought long and hard —and ultimately unsuccessfully—against the appointment of anyone besides the previous incumbent, Suleyman Demirel, to the presidency. [See WPR’s Regional Reports Europe, June 2000.]
Radikal’s Ismet Berkan (Aug. 23) noted that President Sezer emerged victorious from his first political challenge, demonstrating his political independence.
Sabah’s Gulay Gokturk expressed hope that parliamentary discussions of the proposal would lead to workable definitions of “fundamentalism,” “separatism,” and the ability to distinguish between crimes of thought and crimes of deed. “Perhaps,” wrote Gokturk, “there might even be discussions of how a 100-percent pure and homogenous state that reflects none of the cultural, political, ideological, religious, and ethnic differences and plurality in our society could actually be a ‘democratic state.’ ”
Columnist Mehmet Yilmaz of Radikal (Aug. 24) was less sanguine with regard to the legal process surrounding this measure, predicting that “this will be the moment for a true upheaval.”
![]()
|
| Copyright © 1997-2010 Worldpress.org. All Rights Reserved.
|